Welcome to the Mountjoy Ministries Blog

This blog was authored by Bryan W. Sheldon, author and Bible teacher. His books are listed below. The studies in the blog are offered in the desire that they may be helpful in directing readers to the truths contained in the Bible.

Friday, April 12, 2013

Titles of the Lord Jesus

Son of Abraham

The Bible rightly offers many titles of the Lord Jesus: from ’seed of the woman’ in Genesis to ’King of Kings’ in the book of Revelation. All are necessary to identify His many glorious attributes and offices. One of the first in the New Testament is  ‘Son of Abraham’. Matthew begins: “The record of the genealogy of Jesus the Messiah, the Son of David, the Son of Abraham: Abraham was the father of  ...” (Matt.1:1,2 (NASB)).

In this text Matthew identifies Jesus as Israel’s Messiah. This is quite Biblical. Jesus  Himself advised the congregation in His home synagogue in Nazareth, that He was to embark on a  Messianic ministry: “The Spirit of the Lord is   upon Me, Because He has anointed Me To preach the gospel to the poor; He has sent Me to heal the brokenhearted, To proclaim liberty to the captives And recovery of sight to the blind, To set at liberty those who are oppressed; To proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord”  (Luke 4:18–19).

Any Messianic claimant would need to have the appropriate ancestry – of the seed of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob; of the tribe of Judah; of the family of David. So when Matthew starts his gospel, he begins: The book of  the genealogy of Jesus Christand traces the family ancestry of the Messiah from Abraham, identifying significant punctuation marks on the way. So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; from David to the deportation to Babylon are  fourteen  generations; and from the deportation to Babylon to the    Messiah, fourteen generations” (Matt.1:17 (NASB)). This has a very Jewish flavour and supports the thought that Matthew wrote for a Jewish readership.

So it was required of Jesus, if He were to be a true son of Abraham and brought under the Abrahamic covenant, to be circumcised. This was duly  performed on the eighth day (Luke 2.21). And since He was born   under the Law (that is, the Law of Moses (cf. Matt. 5:17)) it was also necessary that He should be redeemed (Exod.13:13; Numb.18:15). When Jesus was almost 6 weeks old, Mary and Joseph faithfully   presented Jesus in the Temple, paid the redemption   money and heard the priest offer the benediction for the firstborn over the Christ-child (Luke 2.22,23). At the same visit Mary went through the rite of purification (required after the birth of a baby). Right from His birth everything was performed that reflected He was of the stock of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. 

There is another more vital element to this aspect of the proper  lineage. Jesus, during His public ministry, added one more qualification. Only those who did the will of God could be counted a true descendent of Abraham. John the Baptist implied it first when he said, “do not think to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as     our father.’ For I say to you that God is able to raise up children to Abraham from these stones” (Matt. 3:9; Luke 3.8). John was indicating that the proper ancestry was insufficient in itself; they needed to be acting like true children of Abraham.

The essence of this is repeated in the debate       between Jesus and His Jewish listeners in John 8.38-45 They … said to Him, “Abraham is our father.” Jesus said to them, “If you were Abraham’s children, you would do the works of Abraham. (John 8:39) The works of Abraham are, of course, faith and obedience (cf. James 2:21).
Abraham’s faith:
Abraham’s faith is most clearly seen in Genesis chapter 15. The birth of Isaac was a long time   coming, so he asked for some reassurance from the Lord. He got it: “… one who will come from your own body shall be your heir.” Then He brought him outside and said, “Look now toward heaven, and count the stars if you are able to number them.” And He said to him, “So shall your descendants be. And he believed in the Lord, and He  accounted it to him for righteousness” (Gen. 15:4-6
It is this promise of Isaac and those that will be born of his line that Abraham believed and was imputed righteous. And this is where  Paul finds authority for the doctrine of imputed righteousness, and significantly this is the place where the heavenly seed is promised, the seed that will benefit from the imputation of the righteousness of Christ. The blessings of the New Covenant are founded on this event here.
The expositor of justification by faith, Paul, recognised the inclusion of the Gentiles in the covenant ceremony of Genesis 15. “Therefore it is of faith that it might be according to grace, so that the promise might be sure to all the seed, not only to those who are of the law, but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all. (as it is written, “I have made you a father of many nations”) (Rom. 4:16,17) This is acceptable in that the original statement says ‘in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed’.
 Next Time: Abraham's Obedience

Monday, April 1, 2013

The Messiah and His Miracles

A Final Summary

Let us ask our questions again, and summarise our answers.

Did the Jewish nation have any expectation of a Messiah at the beginning of the Christian era?[1] Some historical indicators suggest there was such anticipation, at least among some of the population of Israel. The Baptist’s ministry mightily increased this anticipation.

Did Jesus claim to be the promised Messiah?[2]  Yes!  His claim to be the fulfilment of the Messianic promise of Isaiah 61 would be enough, but repeatedly through His ministry, He called for people to accept Him as such, with dire consequences if they did not.  He said, “ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am He, ye shall die in your sins”.[3]

Did Jesus of Nazareth claim to be God incarnate?[4] Yes He did, both obliquely and directly. This claim was the most difficult for the Sanhedrists to evaluate.  Rejection of this claim allowed them to justify to the public their complicity in the execution of Jesus.

What evidence was the Messiah expected to provide to support His claim?[5] The attesting signs were familiar to the students of the T’nach arising from those identified as attesting signs for the great Jewish prophet and deliverer Moses.

Did Jesus of Nazareth provide that evidence to support His Messianic claim?[6] Yes! His ministry is peppered with attesting miracles, especially the healing of leprosy (in one recorded instance ten lepers healed at the same time), and the casting out of demons in large numbers. The quantity and quality of healings and exorcisms testified that heaven was in harmony with the miraculous ministry of Christ. “The works which the Father hath given me to finish, the same works that I do, bear witness of me”.[7]

How did the nation’s leaders investigate His claims?[8] They followed accepted procedures.  First investigating, then interrogating and finally deciding.  So striking was the ministry of Jesus that the Sanhedrists were compelled to spend many man-hours checking, debating and evaluating the claim of the prophet from Nazareth.

What was the decision of the nation’s leaders?[9] How did the Jews react to His claims?  The leaders rejected them, and led the bulk of the population to reject them also.  The Scribes and Pharisees rejected the Messiah because He exposed their hypocrisy, and opposed both their commitment to the oral law, and their position as interpreters of the law.  The Sadducees rejected Him because He opposed both their doctrine and their hypocrisy. He opposed their doctrine because it was weak and limited, being based on the Pentateuch alone. He exposed the hypocrisy of the many Sadducean priests who gave lip service to holiness by following the rules of purity imposed by the Pentateuch, while being corrupt, running the Temple as their own personal moneymaking monopoly. The rejection of the Messiah was summarised, “light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil”.[10]

What was the response of Jesus to their decision?[11] He rejected that generation of Israel.  The nation contemporary with the coming of their Messiah, as a unit, lost the opportunity to be a part of the Messianic kingdom.  He postponed the Messianic kingdom until a repentant Jewish nation would call for His return. Individual Jews could repent and be saved but the nation’s leaders had wasted the national opportunity.

What happened next?[12] The sign of the prophet Jonah. The first part of the sign was the death of the Messiah (blood on the ground). The second part was His burial, His descent into Hades. The third part of the sign was His resurrection.  The highest exaltation followed the humiliation of Messiah.

And then?  From the throne of God, the Christ of God sent the Spirit of God, to equip and guide the Church.  The commissioned apostles of the Messiah went everywhere preaching His gospel, a gospel of a crucified, resurrected and exalted Messiah, they too providing attesting and authenticating signs.

[1] Chapter 2
[2] Chapter 3
[3] John 8.24; cf 8.28, 13.19, 18.5,6,8
[4] Chapter 4
[5] Chapter 5
[6] Chapter 6-9
[7] John 5.36
[8] Chapter 10
[9] Chap.11
[10] John 3.19
[11] Chapter 12
[12] Chapters 13-15