12 Reasons why I believe Jesus was crucified on the Mount of Olives.
The
site of the crucifixion of the Saviour of the World has been considered and
debated for centuries. There have been those who have taken clues from the
Gospel writers, added such information that has been provided by archaeology,
and pointed to some spot either in or near the city of Jerusalem. But for those
who are Bible students the results do not seem to echo that which they feel the
Scriptures depict.
There
are two sites that have obtained favour, one is now the site of the Church of
the Holy Sepulchre, and the other is known as Gordon’s Calvary. Most visitors
to Jerusalem are taken to these locations where they may contemplate the mighty
act of redemption that is said to have taken place there. But the Bible tells
us that the death of Jesus of Nazareth, Messiah of Israel and Son of God, was
as a sacrifice for sin, and if so, had to meet the very particular and detailed
requirements laid down in the T’nach for an acceptable sacrifice. If His
crucifixion took place at either of the traditional locations it would not have
been admissible and we would still be without hope. Moreover, the whole purpose
of the incarnation would have been overthrown and Satan would have accomplished
His purpose of ensuring that the death of the Messiah was invalidated because
it did not meet the strict demands laid down in the Torah.
However,
this writer suggests that the death Jesus accomplished met all constraints. It
was in the right way, at the right time and also in the right place. I believe
that the Bible gives us enough detail to be confident that all the types and
prophecies were fulfilled and every constraint satisfied. Accordingly we can be
confident that future events will also be fulfilled exactly as prophesied in
the Scriptures.
So
this booklet is offered to provide some Scriptural pointers to the place where
the greatest single act for the salvation of humankind was accomplished. I
believe that the death of Jesus was prophesied in the T’nach (Old Testament)
and accomplished in accordance with prophecy and type. Therefore it had to be
on the day specified, at the time designated, fulfilling prophecy and
specifically in the place chosen by God.
Why I Believe Jesus was in the tomb for a full three nights and three days or 'The Sign of the Prophet Jonah'
While
the question does not impact on our salvation (that is secure if we believe
that Jesus died for our sins and rose again), nevertheless a lack of clarity on
the subject is enough to be an irritation and possibly, for those of a certain
temperament, a pinprick in their confidence in the total reliability of the
Bible.
The
usual method of squaring the circle is stated thus: “‘Three days and three
nights’ represents a Semitic idiom for any portion of three calendar days. So
there is no need to see a contradiction with the usual Holy Week chronology,
including a Friday crucifixion and a Sunday resurrection, or to propose an
alternative chronology” (Craig L. Blomberg). This does not sit well with some
of those that study the Scriptures.
In
our teaching sessions I have offered an alternative which appears to have been
well received, as a result of which I have been asked to publish.
I
recognise that what I offer will not satisfy all—it does not dot all the i‘s
and cross all the t‘s, but it is submitted with a humble desire to contribute
to the discussion.
The Messiah and the Priesthood of Israel
The
education of the nation of Israel was extensive, detailed and
comprehensive. It
was founded by covenant which established a priestly system that was
meticulously organized and designed to function continuously. At its heart was
a purpose-built Sanctuary where the priesthood could operate as mediators
between the nation and the Lord. In addition to daily offerings, the divinely
inspired Law provided for a calendar of pre-ordained festivals where Israel
could articulate their appreciation for the bounty and mercy of their God.
All of these, the Priesthood, the Sanctuary, the
Sacrifices and the Festivals, were needed to prepare Israel for the coming of
their Messiah, the One whose multi-faceted ministry would require Him:
to be a High Priest of the order of Melchizedek,
operate in the heavenly Sanctuary
where He would offer a superior sacrifice
in accordance with the pre-ordained timetable
to inaugurate a superior covenant.
This book seeks to acknowledge the greatness and glory
of the Lord Jesus as He fulfilled in every detail that which was prefigured by
the priestly culture of Israel.
His was no ordinary death: the biographical part of
the New Testament speaks of His dying as being different to the death of any
other individual, even different to those who were executed at the same time
and in the same location as Him. What was the difference? His decease is put
forward as a death that He accomplished. Not in the terms of a suicide but
rather the ordering of events to fulfill those necessary pre-conditions
published by the Creator God for a substitutionary sacrifice that would provide
the grounds for the reconciliation of sinful humanity. Others might suffer
death but He accomplished His (Luke 9:31). His decease had to be at a very
specific time, on a very specific date, in a very specific place, in a very
specific way. Although it seemed He was always in imminent danger of losing His
life, He declared that none of the attempts on His life would succeed until He
presented Himself to die in Jerusalem, on a day that He chose, at a time that
He selected, in a pre-ordained location as a ransom for humanity. In other
words His death was the sacrificial offering that in itself satisfied every
demand of a holy God and needed nothing further to perfect it, while at the
same time it ministered meaning to all of Israel’s previous sacrifices.
Moreover, a sacrifice needs a priest to offer it.
Instructions contained in the Bible declare that a qualified, gifted and called
intermediary was necessary for the offering to be acceptable to God. The wonder
of the cross is, that in the purposes of God, the office of priest is occupied
by the same One who was the sacrifice. If we may give a particular emphasis to
the words of Abraham when he was on a similar quest; he said, “My son, God
will provide himself a lamb for a burnt offering” (Gen. 22:8, KJV) (all
references will be from the NKJV unless otherwise stated). Jesus, Israel’s
Messiah, as High Priest brought the perfect sacrifice (Himself) and lay down
His life for the sins of the world; then continuing in His office as High
Priest entered the presence of God with the blood of the sacrifice, that is,
His own precious blood. The objection that He was not of the tribe of Levi and
the family of Aaron, as required by the Law of Moses, is overcome by the
knowledge that there was another order of High Priest in the Bible; an order
that is identified as being superior to the Aaronic order; an order that allows
for a King/Priest. It is the order of Melchizedek (Ps. 110:4 based on Gen:
14:18-20 (see chapter 14)). The Scriptures put forward the case that Jesus of
Nazareth was called to be High Priest of that order.
This book is therefore a study based on the premise
that the Priesthood and Monarchy of Israel were offices authorized by God to
prepare Israel for the coming of their Messiah, although for our current
enquiry it will be the Priesthood that will receive our attention. To be able
to extract spiritual benefit from this subject we will need to examine the
history and training of Israel. There we will find finger-posts and pointers to
the coming of the One who would be Sovereign and Saviour, Priest and Offering.
