The Significance of the Death of the
Messiah
Going back to the principles laid down in Genesis,
spilt blood implies:
(1) A substitutionary sacrifice, (like the lambs of
Abel’s flock[1], or the
ram replacing Isaac on the altar).[2]
(2) A life taken unjustly, (like Abel, the first
martyr).[3]
(3) A life taken justly, (in payment for a crime). [4]
It could be argued that the blood of the Messiah
was shed in compliance with these three principles.
(1) As a
substitutionary sacrifice.
(2) Was a
life taken unjustly.
(3) Was
payment for a capital crime.
That the death of the Messiah falls into the
category of (2) ‘a life taken unjustly’ is self-evident. The judicial killing of Jesus of Nazareth was
the murder of the only innocent man that ever lived. He was holy, harmless, undefiled and separate
from sinners.[5] Pilate,
the only judge that mattered, said, “I find no fault in this man”.[6]
It was also the payment for (3) capital crime,
though not His own. This points to the
idea of (1) substitution (one life given instead of another). It is evident that the New Testament emphasis
is on this substitutionary aspect of the death of the Messiah. Peter wrote, “… who Himself bore our sins in His own body on the tree.” [7] Again, “For Christ also suffered once for
sins, the just for the unjust, that
He might bring us to God.”[8] Paul wrote, “For He made Him who knew no
sin to be sin for us,
that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.” [9] These echo the prophecy of Isaiah, “He was wounded for our
transgressions, He was
bruised for our iniquities.” [10]
“All we like sheep have gone astray; We have turned, every one, to his own way;
And the Lord
has laid on Him the iniquity of us all”. [11]
With Moses, the sacrifice of the Passover lambs,
evidenced by the blood applied to the doorways of the homes of the Israelite
slaves, was the best illustration of this spiritual principle. Meditation on
this momentous event was also the best educator of the nation and Moses
commanded them, and future generations, to remember and celebrate it annually.
Notwithstanding the spiritual principle
established at the exodus, the substitutionary nature of the death of the
Messiah was not just one life for another but one life instead of all others.
This truth is at the heart of the great Adam passage in Romans 5, where Paul
wrote that as one man’s act of disobedience brought judgement and death to all
men, so the act of obedience by One Man brought justification, and removed the
death sentence. “Therefore, as through one man’s offence judgment came to all men, resulting
in condemnation, even so through one Man’s righteous act the free gift came to all men,
resulting in justification of life. For as by one man’s disobedience many were
made sinners, so also by one Man’s obedience many will be made righteous.” [12]
In his other great Adam passage, he says it even more clearly. “For as in Adam
all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive”.[13]
The theological implications of the death of Christ in this
manner, is normally expressed by such words as ‘propitiation’, ‘expiation’ and
‘purification’,
Historically, there are three stages in the provision of ‘propitiation’.
(i) Because God is holy, His wrath is directed toward sin and must
be appeased to spare man from eternal destruction. His wrath was awakened by Adam’s
transgression.
(ii) God provided the remedy by sending Christ as a sin offering.
(iii) Christ’s death assuaged the wrath of God, satisfied His holiness
and averted His wrath.
Propitiation is Godward; God is
propitiated—His holiness is vindicated and satisfied by the death of Christ. The Greek verb ἱλάσκομαι (propitiation) occurs twice in the New
Testament, in Luke 18.13 and significantly in Hebrews, “Therefore, in all
things He had to be made like His
brethren, that He might be a merciful and faithful High Priest in things pertaining to God, to make propitiation for the sins of the
people.” [14] As a noun it appears in John’s letters, “And
He Himself is the propitiation for
our sins, and not for ours only but also for the whole world,” [15]
and “In this is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His
Son to be the propitiation for our sins”. [16]
It appears once again in Paul’s writing. “Whom God set forth as a propitiation by His blood, through faith, to demonstrate His
righteousness, because in His forbearance God had passed over the sins that
were previously committed”. [17]
Expiation
is not a word that is found in the New Testament but some translations use it
to replace ‘propitiation’.[18] While
the primary meaning of ἱλασμός means ‘propitiation’, it surely contains something of the sense
of expiation. While propitiation is
Godward, expiation is manward or rather sinward. It is sin that needs to be expiated. The death of Christ not only propitiated God
but also expiated sin, allowing God to “demonstrate at the present time His
righteousness, that He might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith
in Jesus.” [19] The death of Jesus Christ is presented as the
ground on which a righteous God can pardon a guilty and sinful race without in
any way compromising His righteousness.
Purification. The death of Christ provided both blood and
water, as John witnessed, “But
one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and forthwith came there out
blood and water”.[20]
John, emphasised the miracle of this divine provision with a threefold
affirmation
(i)
“And
he who has seen has testified, and
(ii)
“his testimony is true; and
Blood and water are the two cleansing agents under the
Mosaic dispensation. The
Tabernacle and the Temple ,
the two centres where the principle of substitution was a daily occurrence,
both had two pieces of furniture outside the Holy Place . A laver containing water for cleansing, and
an altar which incorporated the shedding of blood, the primary cleansing agent. During the Temple period, the lambs brought for
sacrifice were first washed in water, in the Pool of Israel, and then their
blood was shed.
Again, the
Law required the leper to be purified by the use of blood and water
before he could be pronounced ritually ‘clean’. He would bath in water, and sacrifices would
be made, the blood of which would be applied to his right ear, his right thumb
and his right big toe.[22]
Moses ratified the first covenant with blood and
water. “For when Moses had
spoken every precept to all the people according to the law, he took the blood of calves and of goats, with water … and sprinkled both the
book, and all the people.”[23]
The second covenant was similarly ratified. At His last meal, the celebration of the
Passover, the Messiah took the third cup, the cup of blessing and gave it a new
significance. He said, “This cup is the new testament in my blood,
which is shed for you”. [24]
The cup that He drank that night was not only wine but mingled wine and water,[25]
symbolising the sacred fluids that would pour from His side at the time of His
execution.
While both blood and water are cleansing agents,
those major passages that deal with the subject clearly indicate that blood is
the primary cleansing agent. The passage
that states that the first covenant was ratified by the use of blood and water
continues, “This is the blood of the covenant which God has commanded you. Then likewise
he sprinkled with blood both the tabernacle and all the vessels of the
ministry. And according to the law
almost all things are purified with blood, and without shedding of blood there
is no remission.” [26] Jesus, while declaring the cup of mingled
wine and water to be the symbol of His sacrifice, identifies the cup as “the
new covenant in My blood”. When Moses took the water of the Nile and poured it out, it became blood on the ground. Blood
is clearly the cleansing agent incorporated in a substitutionary
sacrifice. John wrote, “the blood of
Jesus Christ His Son cleanses us from all sin.” [27] It is most clearly stated in the songs of
Revelation. “To Him who loved us and washed us from our sins in His own blood,
and has made us kings and priests to His God and Father, to Him be glory and dominion forever and
ever. Amen.” [28] An elder described the martyrs of the
tribulation. “These are the ones who come out of the great tribulation, and washed their robes and made them white in
the blood of the Lamb.” [29]
The propitiatory nature of His sacrifice is
appropriated, “through faith in his blood”. [30] Individuals are “justified by His blood”. [31]
Paul wrote, “We have redemption through His blood”,[32]
and “have been brought near by the blood of Christ”. [33]
Reconciliation and peace come through “the blood of His cross”.[34]
It is the blood of Christ that purges the conscience.[35]
It is the blood of Christ that gives access to God.[36]
Sanctification comes through the blood of Christ.[37]
While seemingly subordinate as a cleansing agent,
water is not totally overlooked by the New Testament writers. John recorded the symbolic action of the
Messiah in the upper room when Jesus washed the feet of the disciples. The mysterious word of explanation related to
a secondary cleansing. Simon had protested
and refused the foot washing, to which Jesus reacted, “If I do not wash you,
you have no part with Me.” [38]
Simon, missing the point asks for an additional cleansing. Jesus answered, “He who is bathed needs only
to wash his feet, but is
completely clean; and you are clean, but not all of you. For He knew who would
betray Him; therefore He said, You are not all clean.” [39]
Clearly, the washing with water was symbolic and was perhaps connected with the
requirement that priests in the Temple
were not allowed to participate in sacrificial duties unless their feet were
washed.
The figurative cleansing nature of water is emphasised
by the rite of baptism. Ananias
instructed Paul, “Arise and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on
the name of the Lord.” [40] Paul referred to the symbolic washing with
water in Ephesians, “Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the
church and gave Himself for her, that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word, that
He might present her to Himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle
or any such thing, but that she should be holy and without blemish.” [41]
The writer to the Hebrews does not overlook it. “Let us draw near with a true
heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil
conscience and our bodies washed with
pure water.” [42]
[1] Gen.4.4
[2]
Gen.22.13
[3] Gen.4.10
[4] Gen.9.6
[5] Heb.7.26
[6] Luke 23.4; John 19.6
[7] 1
Pet.2:24
[8] 1
Pet.3:18
[9] 2
Cor.5:21
[10]
Isa.53.5
[11]
Isa.53.6
[12]
Rom.5.18,19
[13] 1
Cor.15:22
[14]
Heb.2.17
[15] 1 John
2.2
[16] 1 John
4.10
[17]
Rom.3.25
[18] 1 John
4.10 (RSV)
[19]
Rom.3.26
[20] John
19.34
[21] John
19.35
[22] Lev.14
[23]
Heb.9.19
[24] Lk
22:20
[25]
Pes.10.III.A (Mishnah)
[26]
Heb.9:20-22
[27] 1 John
1:7
[28]
Rev.1.5,6
[29]
Rev.7:14
[30]
Rom.3.25 (AV)
[31] Rom.5.9
[32]
Eph.1.7; Col.1.14; 1 Pet.1.19; Rev.5.9
[33] Eph.2.13
[34] Col.1.20
[35] Heb.9.14
[36] Heb.10.19
[37] Heb.13.12
[38] John
13.8
[39] John
13.10,11
[40] Acts
22.16
[41]
Eph.5:25-27
[42]
Heb.10:22
No comments:
Post a Comment